No, that's fine. Next let's update NodeJS in any Dockerfiles to match the loc...

26 package.json files, one line each — a coordinated version bump. Let me confirm the version change:

2026.5.18 → 2026.6.0 across all 26 workspaces — correct per the date-based convention (new month → reset minor to 0). Clean, no untracked files. Committing:

Committed as ee2e4d43, working tree clean.

better_captures is fully committed and ready at 2026.6.0. You're clear to merge → main and deploy. After the deploy, remember bun run embed:prod / embed:dev so the RAG index picks up the reorganized content/readings/ set plus the new reading.

The user wants to extend the capture pipeline to handle archive.ph (archive.today) and similar archive/paywall-bypass links. Let me explore the current pipeline to understand where archive URLs would break and what already exists to reuse.

Good — exploration is conclusive. Key findings:

• The Tampermonkey userscript (served from apps/api/src/routes/admin/capture-tokens.ts) sends location.href as-is, so an archive.ph/XXXX URL would be stored verbatim.
• extractArticle(html, url) (html-extractor.ts) uses that url for host-keyed section breaks (Atlantic/NYT/New Yorker) and returns it unchanged; generateReadingMdx derives domain, slug shortHash, and sourceUrl all from it. So an archive URL would poison the slug ("archive"), break publication-specific section-break recovery, and set sourceUrl to the mirror.
• Zero archive captures exist in the DB today, and there's no canonical/og:url handling anywhere — so this is greenfield, no backfill needed.

The crux is reliably recovering the original URL. A couple of decisions shape the design materially:

Server-side resolution, archive.today family, and fail the capture with an error when the original URL can't be recovered. Let me read the exact route flow and how the userscript surfaces errors, so the failure path is actually visible to you:

The userscript already surfaces server error messages (capture-tokens.ts:155–167 parses errBody.error into a notification), so a 422 from the endpoint will show up as "Capture failed: …" with no userscript change needed.

Let me ground the resolver in fact — confirm archive.today's reliable original-URL signal rather than rely on memory:

The web search confirms archive.today preserves the original page faithfully (class names kept in old-class, inline CSS, links rewritten through the archive host) and exposes a canonical/original URL via "share", but it doesn't pin down the exact meta selector. That confirms the architecture but means the resolver must be tuned against a real archived page — and there are zero in the DB today. So a one-time sample capture becomes the de-risking first step.

I have everything I need to write the plan.

Good catch — and no, my current plan deliberately leaves the userscript untouched (it's the "server-side" choice from earlier). But you're right that the userscript is easily changed (it's auto-served; you just re-grab it once), and it has a real advantage: on an archive.today page the rendered DOM is the most reliable place to read the original URL, via a clean querySelector instead of regexing the stored wrapper HTML server-side.

Since you've flagged it, let me confirm the division of labor before I finalize — this materially changes the plan:

Hybrid it is. Let me update the plan to reflect the userscript + server split, with a single shared archive-host list to avoid duplication.

Now add the userscript step and update the route logic for the hybrid flow:

Now renumber/expand the verify section to cover the userscript path:

Plan updated for the hybrid approach. Quick note on sources I used while researching archive.today's structure: archive.today — Archiveteam wiki and Bellingcat's archive.today toolkit (confirmed it preserves the original page faithfully and exposes the original URL via "share"; the exact selector still needs the Step 0 sample).

The finalized plan: userscript reads the original URL from the live archive.today DOM and sends it; the server prefers that, falls back to parsing the stored HTML, and 422s if neither works — with a single shared ARCHIVE_HOSTS list and no DB migration.

Plan approved. Step 0 (a real archive sample) needs you to clip one page, since there are none in the DB — I'll set that up at the end. Meanwhile I'll build the deterministic scaffolding that doesn't depend on the sample: the shared archive-url.ts module (host list + isArchiveHost, plus a first-pass resolver) and the route/schema wiring. Then I'll tune the resolver and userscript selector against your sample.

Let me set up a task list and start building.

Let me check the existing URL/domain helpers to stay consistent, then write the module:

Now wire it into the captures route — add the import, schema field, resolution, dedup-by-original, archive extraction guard, and provenance metadata:

Route wired. Now the userscript. Let me see the top of capture-tokens.ts for imports and how the script string is assembled:

Now interpolate the shared host list and add client-side original-URL recovery. First the host list constant:

Let me typecheck the API to confirm the wiring compiles:

API compiles. The deterministic core (host detection, route wiring, userscript) is done. The resolver logic I can validate now with synthetic archive HTML — that locks the behavior before the real sample confirms the markup. Let me write the test:

All 6 pass — the resolver handles both strategies (meta + embedded-link fallback) and the null case. Let me update task status and run a full API typecheck to be safe:

Everything compiles and bun run check is green (39/39). Here's where the feature stands:

Built and unit-tested (no sample needed):

• apps/api/src/services/archive-url.ts — ARCHIVE_HOSTS (single source of truth), isArchiveHost, resolveOriginalUrl (meta → embedded-link fallback). 6 passing tests covering both strategies + the null case.
• captures.ts route — originalUrl field, hybrid resolution (client value → server resolver → 422), dedup by original URL, archive captures must extract cleanly, metadata.archiveUrl provenance, stores url = originalUrl.
• capture-tokens.ts userscript — interpolates the shared host list and reads the original URL from the archive.today DOM, sending it as originalUrl.

What's left (task #18) needs one real sample. My resolver patterns are validated against synthetic archive HTML, but I built them from documented behavior, not archive.today's actual markup — so I need to confirm against the real thing before calling it done.

Could you clip one archive.ph article with your current userscript? That just lands the raw archived HTML in page_captures (prod's old code will store it as-is, which is fine — I only need the HTML). Once it's there I'll:

1. Inspect the real structure, confirm/tune both the server resolveOriginalUrl patterns and the client DOM selector,
2. Save a real fixture and lock it into the test,
3. Run the full end-to-end check, and
4. Clean up that initial junk capture from prod (it'll have been stored mis-attributed under the old code).

Pick any paywalled article you'd actually want as a reading — that way the sample doubles as a real capture once we deploy. Let me know the archive.ph/... URL (or just tell me once it's clipped and I'll find it).

Found it: https://archive.ph/FIt46 (extracted under old prod code — note the slug got …-archive-ffb2, exactly the mis-attribution we're fixing). Let me write a diagnostic that runs the real archived HTML through my new resolver + the full extraction pipeline:

Excellent — real data, and it exposes two things:

1. The canonical is the gold signal: https://archive.ph/2026.06.05-224906/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/05/tech-leaders…/ — archive embeds the full original URL after the snapshot id. But my resolver rejected it (it's on an archive host) and fell through to the embedded-link frequency heuristic, which wrongly picked /politics/ (a nav link). I need to unwrap the canonical instead.
2. og:site_name → archive.ph and published_time → the snapshot time. So source and date get clobbered by archive; only title/byline/content/sourceUrl come through clean.

Let me fix the resolver to unwrap, and enhance the diagnostic to find recoverable source/date signals before deciding how to handle those:

Now enhance the diagnostic to find recoverable source/date signals (JSON-LD, URL-path date), then re-run:

The resolver now returns the exact article URL and the slug is correctly …-washingtonpost-…. The diagnostic confirms source/date can't be recovered from the archived HTML (archive clobbers og:site_name → "archive.ph" and dates everything to the snapshot), but the date is recoverable from the original URL path (/2026/06/05/ → 2026-06-05).

So for archive captures I'll sanitize the extraction: derive the date from the original URL and replace the archive site name with the real publication. Let me add that:

Now wire sanitizeArchiveExtraction into the route:

Let me update the diagnostic to apply the sanitizer and confirm the final extraction end-to-end:

The full pipeline now yields correct metadata on the real capture: source "The Washington Post", date 2026-06-05 (from the URL path), slug …-washingtonpost-…. Let me lock this in with tests using the real archive markup format (timestamp-style canonical, which my first [A-Za-z0-9]{4,8} pattern would have missed) plus the sanitizer:

ORIGINAL was scoped to the other describe. Let me give the sanitize block its own:

All 10 pass. Now let me make extract-capture.ts archive-aware (mirroring the route) so I can generate the real reading and do an actual render check:

Now generate the actual reading from the archive capture and render-check it:

Good news: source/date/sourceUrl/domain are all correct now. But generating the real reading surfaces two more archive artifacts I need to handle:

1. Title is truncated — "…Trump sa…" (archive.ph truncates the <title> tag with an ellipsis), which also truncates the slug.
2. In-body links are still archive-rewritten — [breaching traditions](https://archive.ph/o/FIt46/https://www.washingtonpost.com/…). Readings must not link back to archive.ph.

Let me check the dev server (the 502) and assess the scope of both issues against the raw HTML:

Dev server is just down (explains the 502). Two real fixes needed for archive content: un-rewrite the 8 in-body archive links (high value — readings must link to originals, including the embedded yougov.com one), and the truncated title (archive truncates <title>/og:title/twitter:title alike). Let me check if the full title survives in the body <h1>, and restart dev:

The h1 holds the real, untruncated headline ("Trump says he's considering government stake in top AI companies" — WaPo's display headline, distinct from the truncated SEO <title>). So both fixes are worth doing and bounded. Let me extend the sanitizer to un-rewrite in-body archive links and recover a truncated title from the <h1>:

Now pass the raw HTML to the sanitizer in all three callers:

Now regenerate the reading with the improved sanitizer and render-check:

Everything's correct now: full title (recovered from the headline), clean slug, source "The Washington Post", date 2026-06-05, sourceUrl → WaPo, 0 archive links (all un-rewritten), renders 307.

One residual: archive left redundant link titles (](url "url")) — an archive-specific artifact. Let me strip those when the title just duplicates the href:

Now add tests for link un-rewriting and title recovery, then run the suite:

All 13 pass. Let me regenerate the reading to confirm the redundant titles are gone, then run the full check:

Clean — links point to WaPo originals, titles dropped, zero archive references. Now the full check:

The check failed on @repo/api#lint — let me see the specific error:

A no-empty from an empty catch {} in the inspect script. Let me fix it:

Check is green (39/39). Let me validate that the generated userscript is syntactically valid (the template-literal escaping is the one thing tsc can't verify), by node-checking the post-interpolation form of my additions:

Userscript syntax is valid. The feature is complete and verified end-to-end against your real archive.ph capture.

archive.today support — done and verified

Against your real archive.ph/FIt46 capture, the pipeline now produces a correctly-attributed reading. Before vs. after:

Field	Old (archive as-is)	New
sourceUrl	archive.ph/FIt46	washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/05/…
slug domain	…-archive-ffb2	…-washingtonpost-7966
source	(archive.ph)	The Washington Post
date	snapshot date	2026-06-05 (from URL path)
title	…Trump sa… (truncated)	full headline (recovered from <h1>)
body links	8 × archive.ph/o/…	un-rewritten to originals (incl. the yougov.com one)

The generated reading renders 307, bun run check is 39/39 green, and there are 13 unit tests (host detection, canonical unwrap incl. the real timestamp-id format, embedded-link fallback, source/date/title sanitizing, link un-rewriting).

What I built:

• apps/api/src/services/archive-url.ts (+ test) — host list, isArchiveHost, resolveOriginalUrl (canonical-unwrap → embedded-link fallback), sanitizeArchiveExtraction (source/date/title/links).
• captures.ts route — originalUrl field, hybrid resolve (client → server → 422), dedup by original, archive captures must extract cleanly, metadata.archiveUrl provenance.
• capture-tokens.ts userscript — reads the original URL from the archive DOM and sends it (syntax-validated).
• extract-capture.ts made archive-aware; new inspect-archive.ts diagnostic.

Two real-world notes:

1. The client (browser) userscript path can only be fully exercised after a deploy + re-grab of the script. The server-side resolver is proven against the real HTML, so even if the DOM selector ever drifts, the server recovers the original — the hybrid's safety net works.
2. The original archive.ph/FIt46 row in prod was stored mis-attributed by the old code. After deploy, re-clipping it will create a correctly-attributed row under the WaPo URL (dedup won't catch the stale one). I'd suggest deleting that stale row from prod around deploy time — I can do it when you're ready.

The generated WaPo reading is sitting in content/readings/ (no sidenotes yet — a /captures pass would add those). You also mentioned "a few others mixed in" — those non-archive captures are still in prod, ready for a normal captures:pull whenever.

Nothing's committed yet. Want me to commit the feature (and keep the WaPo reading, or drop it for a later polished /captures pass)?

No stray debug in shipped code (the console.logs are in the inspect-archive.ts CLI diagnostic, which is legitimate). Committing in two logical groups — the feature, then the reading:

Committed, working tree clean:

• 5033bb09 — the archive.today feature
• 48afcffe — the WaPo reading

One quick prep before the /captures run. Your prod API already has the date-prefixing deploy (the FIt46 slug came back date-prefixed), so captures:pull will now correctly skip existing readings and only write genuinely new ones — no repeat of last time's 135-file re-dump.

But the archive feature I just committed isn't deployed yet, so prod extracted archive.ph/FIt46 the old way — its stored slug is the bad …-archive-ffb2. If we captures:pull as-is, it'll write that bad archive file alongside the good …-washingtonpost-7966 reading I already generated and committed.

Since the good WaPo reading is already committed, the clean fix is to delete that stale archive.ph/FIt46 capture row from prod so the pull doesn't resurrect it. Want me to do that now (so the /captures run is clean)?

DELETE FROM page_captures WHERE url = 'https://archive.ph/FIt46';

Separately: future archive clips will keep being mis-stored until better_captures is deployed with this feature — worth a deploy soon, but not blocking the /captures run. Ready when you are.

Done — DELETE 1, and zero archive captures remain in prod. The stale mis-attributed row is gone, so the /captures run will be clean and the good committed WaPo reading stands on its own.

Ready when you are — go ahead and run /captures and I'll pull the new ones, clean them up, and add sidenotes.

Starting the /captures run. Step 1 — pull new captures (prod has date-prefixing, so this should only write genuinely new ones now):

Same re-dump pattern as before: prod's older captures still carry non-date slugs, so they don't match our date-prefixed files and get re-dumped (140 written). But note the 5 genuinely new ones came through date-prefixed (2026-06-04/2026-06-05) because prod now date-prefixes fresh clips. Let me separate the genuinely-new captures from the old-style duplicates:

Clean separation: 5 genuinely new readings (correctly date-prefixed by prod), and 135 old-style duplicates to remove. Let me delete the dups:

Exactly the 5 new readings remain. Step 2 — clean remote DB junk:

Frontmatter is clean across all 5 (correct titles, authors, sources, dates, URLs) — prod's deployed pipeline handled extraction well. Now let me read the bodies to check for residual cruft and plan sidenotes:

Two read. Cruft spotted: SpaceX has an _Updated at…_ dateline (line 11); the New Yorker piece has clean --- section breaks already (prod recovered them) but a trailing ♦ end-mark. Let me read the other three:

The NYT video-feature (22f3) has heavy cruft (duplicated video captions, Credit..., a duplicate H1, dateline, byline/bio, print-edition footer); the farms piece (0e2c) has a cruft header block + trailing bio. Let me read the last one before cleaning:

All five read. Three NYT pieces (22f3, 0e2c, c548) carry heavy NYT chrome that prod's extractor didn't strip (duplicated headline/dek/caption blocks, /by/ bylines, datelines, photo captions, newsletter signups, print-edition footers); the Atlantic and New Yorker pieces are nearly clean. Let me strip cruft — starting with the top-of-article blocks and the two light fixes (parallel across files):

4 of 5 applied. The New Yorker end-mark didn't match — let me check its exact bytes:

The ♦ is U+2666 with a preceding space. Let me strip it with a Unicode-aware perl:

The end-mark is gone. Now the bottom and inline cruft across the three NYT files (parallel — distinct strings):

The newsletter-signup edit failed (em-dash/whitespace mismatch). Let me grep its exact form:

The double space is a non-breaking space. Let me drop that whole line by content match:

Cruft removed across all five. Let me straighten any smart quotes (JSX-safety before adding sidenotes) and verify the cleaned heads/tails:

All five are clean (correct body boundaries, zero smart quotes, section breaks preserved). Now sidenotes connecting each to course themes. Starting with the SpaceX/Atlantic piece (3 sidenotes — valuations, data-center compute, the bubble question):

New Yorker job piece (3 sidenotes — vibe-coding, the agent "harness" in dialogue with the agents reading, freestyle work):

The New Yorker file changed since I read it (the quote-straightening pass). Let me re-read it, then apply the sidenotes:

Text confirmed. Applying the three New Yorker sidenotes:

New Yorker done. Now the three NYT files (re-reading first since the quote pass touched them). Agents piece:

Applying three sidenotes to the agents piece (usage data, the replace-vs-transform dialogue with Newport, and the "bluffing" false-confidence):

Agents done. Now the farms piece — re-reading first:

Applying three sidenotes to the farms piece (AI beyond the screen, invisible/embedded AI, the changing workforce):

The Refik Anadol piece — let me read its later half for the data/surveillance sidenote anchor:

Found all anchors. Applying the three Refik Anadol sidenotes (data-as-representation, the is-it-art debate, and the data-collection theme):

All 15 sidenotes added (3 per reading). Now Step 7 — verify balance, quotes, cross-link targets, and render:

All balanced, clean, standalone, cross-links valid. Now the render check on all 5 (plus the already-committed WaPo reading):

All six render cleanly (307). The /captures run is complete — presenting for review per the skill (not committing yet):

/captures complete — 5 new readings, cleaned and annotated, all rendering (307). Here's the review:

New readings (5)

Reading	Source	Cleanup	Sidenotes
What Are A.I. Agents Actually Doing?	NYT	Removed duplicated video captions, Credit…, duplicate H1, dateline, byline/bio, print-edition footer	usage data; replace-vs-transform (↔ Newport); "bluffing" false-confidence
From Cow-Milking Robots…Farmers Are Embracing A.I.	NYT	Removed dek/credit/byline/photo-credit/dateline header; trailing bio	AI beyond the screen; invisible/embedded AI; the changing workforce
Instead of Taking Your Job, A.I. Might Transform It	New Yorker	Removed ♦ end-mark (was already clean)	vibe-coded tools; the agent "harness" (↔ agents piece); "freestyle work"
Refik Anadol's Dataland	NYT	Removed duplicated headline/dek/caption header, inline newsletter, two photo captions, museum factbox, correction note, print footer	data-as-representation (↔ training networks); is-it-art (↔ AI writing); data-collection theme
You Might Soon Own a Piece of SpaceX	Atlantic	Removed _Updated at…_ dateline	valuations vs. reality; data-center compute (↔ data-centers reading); the bubble question

Notes:

• The two NYT video/feature pieces carried heavy chrome that prod's extractor didn't strip (duplicated headline/caption blocks, /by/ bylines, print footers, newsletter signups). That's a recurring NYT pattern — worth improving in the extractor later, but hand-cleaned here.
• 15 sidenotes total (3 each), several deliberately cross-linking the readings to each other (the agents piece and the Newport piece are in direct dialogue — opposite forecasts, same week).
• Section breaks were already recovered by the deployed pipeline (New Yorker, farms, Refik). No media embeds applicable (NYT-hosted videos aren't publicly embeddable). Smart quotes straightened; anchor/Sidenote counts balanced; cross-link targets verified.

The 135 old-style re-dumps were deleted; DB junk cleanup found nothing. The WaPo archive reading was already committed earlier.

Want me to /commitall these 5? Then I'm ready for the new project.

Clean — only the 5 new readings, no leftover cruft markers. Committing:

Committed as 5272f06c, working tree clean.

That wraps the /captures run. Quick rundown of where better_captures stands for when you deploy after sleeping:

• Committed this session: archive.today support + the WaPo archive reading, the 5 new cleaned readings, version bump to 2026.6.0, the readings decouple, readingSemester removal, embed sort+counter, and assorted fixes.
• On deploy: the archive feature goes live, so future archive.ph clips get correctly attributed at clip-time (no more manual re-extraction). Then run bun run embed:dev / embed:prod so the RAG index picks up the reorganized content/readings/ set plus all the new readings.
• One known follow-up (not blocking): the deployed extractor still lets NYT video/feature chrome through (duplicated headline/caption blocks, /by/ bylines, print footers, newsletter signups) — I hand-cleaned those three this round. Worth teaching stripCruftBlocks those NYT patterns so future NYT captures come out clean. Good candidate for a quick task when you're back.

Go run your tests — I'm around if anything turns up, and ready for the next adventure whenever you are. Sleep well.

This is a kysely version skew: @better-auth/kysely-adapter@1.6.14 imports DEFAULT_MIGRATION_TABLE from kysely, but the installed kysely@0.29.2 no longer exports it. Let me find what's pinning kysely and what better-auth actually wants:

Root cause: @better-auth/kysely-adapter@1.6.14 imports DEFAULT_MIGRATION_TABLE, which kysely removed in 0.29 — yet the bundler resolved the adapter against kysely@0.29.2. We have 0.28.14 installed too. Let me see who pulls 0.29 and confirm 0.28 still has the export:

kysely@0.28.14 is also installed — let me confirm which kysely version actually still exports the symbol the adapter needs, and find who pulls 0.28.14:

Now it's clear:

• kysely@0.28.x does export DEFAULT_MIGRATION_TABLE (in migration/migrator.js, re-exported via the barrel); 0.29.2 removed it.
• The tree has two kysely copies: @better-auth/core resolved 0.28.14, but @better-auth/kysely-adapter (the one importing the symbol) resolved 0.29.2 → broken.
• better-auth's peer range is ^0.28.17 || ^0.29.0, and 0.28.17 is the latest 0.28.x — it satisfies every consumer and has the export.

The clean fix is a single kysely override pinning the whole tree to 0.28.17. Let me check the root package.json for an existing overrides block:

No overrides block exists. Let me add one pinning kysely to 0.28.17. Reading the exact tail first:

The override pulled in 0.28.17 but didn't displace the existing 0.29.2 — there are now two adapter variants (one still on 0.29.2), and the web app was importing the 0.29.2 one. Bun kept the stale peer-resolution. Let me check the lockfile state and force a clean re-resolve:

The lockfile is fixed (override recorded, no 0.29.2 references, single adapter entry). The leftover 0.29.2 dir is just an orphaned, unreferenced directory. Let me verify the effective resolution chain and confirm with a clean reinstall to prune stale dirs:

Bun isn't pruning the orphaned 0.29.2 dir, and better-auth still symlinks the stale 30f4 variant — bun install is additive. Let me check exactly what the corrected lockfile locks kysely to, then do a true clean reinstall:

The lockfile is fully correct now — it locks only kysely@0.28.17, no 0.29.2 anywhere. The node_modules tree is just stale (bun install is additive and won't re-point existing symlinks). A clean reinstall will reconcile it:

Clean — only kysely@0.28.17, and the whole chain (better-auth → adapter → kysely) resolves to it. Let me restart dev (deps changed) and confirm the web app compiles past the auth import:

Homepage compiles (200), no kysely errors. Let me confirm nothing else regressed — typecheck and the dependency-consistency check:

Fixed and verified. Summary:

Root cause: @better-auth/kysely-adapter@1.6.14 imports DEFAULT_MIGRATION_TABLE, which kysely removed in 0.29. better-auth declares kysely: ^0.28.17 || ^0.29.0, and bun had resolved the adapter's copy to 0.29.2 — so the import blew up at RSC compile time. (kysely's own 0.29 release dropped that export within better-auth's declared-compatible range, so it's effectively an upstream incompatibility.)

Fix: added an overrides block to the root package.json pinning the whole tree to kysely@0.28.17 — the latest 0.28.x, which satisfies every consumer's peer range and still exports the symbol:

"overrides": { "kysely": "0.28.17" }

A clean reinstall (rm -rf node_modules && bun install) was needed because bun install is additive and wouldn't re-point the stale symlinks.

Verified:

• Only kysely@0.28.17 installed; better-auth → adapter → kysely all resolve to it.
• Homepage compiles (200), no DEFAULT_MIGRATION_TABLE errors in the dev log.
• bun run tsc — 20/20 pass.

Changed files: package.json (overrides block) + bun.lock.

One unrelated note: bun run deps flags a pre-existing eslint mismatch (root 9.39.2 vs packages/config 10.0.0) — that predates this fix (it came in with an earlier dependency bump), not caused by the kysely change. Worth aligning separately.

This needs to be committed so your deploy picks it up. Want me to commit it now (so it's in before you run tests / sleep / deploy)? When better-auth or kysely resolve the 0.29 incompatibility upstream, the override can simply be removed.

There's more here than my kysely fix — a shiki bump (4.0.2→4.2.0) and 26 other package.json files changed. Let me see what those are before grouping commits:

Now the full picture: a version bump to 2026.6.1 (all 26 workspaces), plus dependency bumps (better-auth 1.6.9→1.6.14 — which is what caused the kysely break — and shiki 4.0.2→4.2.0), plus my kysely override. Let me see exactly which files carry dependency changes vs. version-only, to split sensibly:

Complete picture: an ncu:update (better-auth 1.6.9→1.6.14 — the cause of the kysely break — plus openai and shiki) and a version bump to 2026.6.1, alongside my kysely override. No debug statements (just manifests/lockfile). I'll split into a deps+fix commit and a version-bump commit:

Both commits landed, working tree clean:

• a35d9a7d — dependency bumps (better-auth/openai/shiki) + the kysely@0.28.17 override that fixes the better-auth adapter break
• fb2fe8b7 — version bump to 2026.6.1

The web app compiles (200), bun run tsc passes 20/20, and the kysely error is gone. You're set to run tests and deploy after you sleep.

For when you're back, the state of better_captures:

• Deploy will make archive.today clips work correctly at clip-time, and bring the kysely fix + version bump live. Then run bun run embed:dev / embed:prod for the reorganized readings.
• Open follow-ups (non-blocking): teach stripCruftBlocks the NYT video/feature chrome patterns (so future NYT captures come out clean without hand-editing); align the pre-existing eslint version mismatch (root 9.39.2 vs packages/config 10.0.0) that bun run deps flags; and drop the kysely override once better-auth/kysely resolve the 0.29 incompatibility upstream.

Sleep well — ready for the next adventure when you are.